I got my Proof of Employment letter from the Board of Education today, which means that as long as I pass both the LAST and the CST, attend pre-service training, and submit all my papers, I can expect to receive a paycheck on September 15 -- even If I'm not placed in a school. Woohoo. I also received my Teaching Fellows Region and University Assignments. I'm in Region 4, which is amazing since it's the exact region that I wanted. Region 4 covers part of Queens, where I live, so I'm looking forward to a good commute. For awhile there I was worried they were going to place me in either the Bronx or in Brooklyn, and that would have meant taking over an hour and half to get to the classroom!
As for my college, they actually gave me a choice. I'm tentatively assigned to City University of New York (CUNY) at Queens, but I have the option to attend CUNY - Brooklyn instead, if I am so inclined. I did the research and I've decided to go to CUNY-Queens. It has better ratings all over. The Princeton Review's 357 Best Colleges ranking system rated it as the 6th Best Value college in the country, and
US News has it on the 50th slot in their Northern Universities - Master's: Top Schools category. Plus the commute from work and home will be better, hopefully.
Speaking of commutes, I had one of my worst this morning. I was scheduled to observe a Special Ed class today as part of my fellows training. I had to go to PS 46, way up in Knightsbridge, located in the northern tip of the Bronx, just under the Westchester border (fourth to the last stop on the 4!). Took me 2 whole hours to find the damn school. Needless to say, I was terribly late.
When I was finally able to take my seat at the back of the room, I must admit I was disappointed with the whole class setup, to say the least. I felt like the students weren't being taught to their potential and that the teacher wasn't taking that great an interest in her students' ability to learn. Case in point: a boy called Jerome.
Jerome's a smart kid, anyone could see that right off the bat. He often raised his hand, could understand the lesson well, and had a certain air of confidence about him that was endearing (if a little arrogant). Yet everytime he wanted to say something, the teacher shushed him, and told him to let the other kids answer -- even if there were no other kids raising their hands. It was obvious the teacher was waiting for all the other kids to catch up, which is great for the slow learners, but terrible for Jerome, because in the interim he would get bored (understandably so, in my opinion) and would consequently lose interest in the lesson. At the very least, I think the teacher could have acknowledged his mental quickness in a more positive way, instead of just shushing him up.
The class also lacked structure. Kids would go to the bathroom and not come back for 10 minutes. Students would mill around and forget all about their assignments. The teacher would let them write three paragraphs about their trip to the zoo for a whole 45-minute period. Yes, I know they're Sp.Ed kids, but none of them have any real learning disabilities, so I don't see why they have to lag far behind their peers, especially since their peers are already lagging behind in terms of the national learning curve. I'm not even sure that some of the kids should be in the Sp.Ed. class to begin with -- they weren't displaying any behavioral/emotional problems that I could see.
And the way they talked down to the kids! The condescension! They still had carpet time and they were already in fourth grade! (Carpet time is like kindergarten, when all the students sit cross-legged on the carpet and the teacher explains the lessons with the aid of a little white board.) They were studying things that made no sense (for math they used up 45 minutes to study patterns on someone's shirt and play probability games, the concept of which was lost on them anyway). And they used a tone of voice that derided rather than respected the children's intelligence.
I'm beginning to think that a serious downside to Bush's "No Child Left Behind" Act is the fact that children are also being discouraged from moving too far forward from their peers. They're being taught - consciously or not -- to stay safely ensconced in the middle, which I firmly believe is a crime to the country's many brilliant kids.
On the whole, my observation day was a bit of a shock. I expected a lot more discipline, a lot more structure, and frankly, a whole lot more "teaching". Most of the time the students were left to their own devices and made to learn their lessons "in their own way" - a teaching method that I still don't fully comprehend. The system is so against rote learning that the students don't even know their multiplication tables - they often use calculators. (It's enough that they understand the concept of multiplication, the actual multiplying is only secondary.) I mean, hey, I'm not a big fan of memorization myself, but I do believe in learning the fundamentals by heart.
Then again, I have to remember that these are classes geared specifically to high need/at-risk students in a public school system and I have never attended a public school in my life. I have to remember that I have no experience with this whole system, which means that I am not in a position to judge (not yet, anyhow). After all, I may be overly critical of their methods simply because I'm so used to a different approach. I may be "old-fashioned" only because I was taught the "old-fashioned way". (None of this "spiralling method" weirdness, which honestly doesn't make much sense to me. *Spiralling means they present lessons in a spiral instead of a linear way, the result being a fifth grader is introduced to concepts that he can't really study in depth because it's way over his head, with the promise that they will
spiral back to it in the coming years.)
We'll see. After all, I have no choice but to keep an open mind.